Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions
– Edwin A. Abbott (1884)
This
slim novella is an amazing combination of social critique and mathematical
exposition. In the very early days of
what was originally called “fantastic fiction,” and is now termed “science
fiction,” part of the purpose of such tales as H.G. Wells’ and Mr. Abbott’s
stories was to educate the populace in what was the forefront of scientific and
mathematical theories and the cutting-edge research and hopes of the time. The men and women who wrote this type of
story were usually personally involved in the science they sought to describe
and were able to communicate very complex ideas by the means of a narrative
story.
The
very best of these stories deal with such universal ideas and open up the mind
of the reader in such a way, that they are still read and appreciated decades
after their original publication. Edwin
Abbott’s Flatland is at once an exploration of dimensionality, and the frame of
reference that must be shattered if one is to “see” reality for what it is, and
also a deeply funny and caustic assault on the entrenched ideas of his time
(Victorian-era England) which saw certain humans as inherently better than
others, and that one’s birth status dictated one’s life status in
perpetuity.
The
narrator of the tale is a resident of Flatland, a world of only two dimensions,
whose populace consists of straight lines (women), and an assortment of
polygons, from the lowest classes (very narrow Isosceles triangles who are the
military and laborers of the world), to multi-sided polygons (squares,
pentagons, hexagons, etc., with class rising in accordance to the number of
sides they have), to polygons with so many sides that they are effectively
treated as Circles, the “Priests/Lawmakers” of the Flatland society, venerated
and deferred to in every way. Abbott’s
description of the inherent nature of each class is very much the way Victorian
people saw humanity, and the way that many people still see humanity to this
day. It is shocking to our modern
sensibilities but very effective in portraying the rigidness and collective
delusion that feeds such ideas.
Flatland delusions are crazy! |
After
many chapters in which the narrator describes Flatland and it’s denizens and
society, he describes a dream he had in which he visited Lineland, a one-dimensional
world where women are points and men are short lines, and everyone lives along
one single axis of existence. He tries to
talk to the Monarch of Lineland and explain how he comes from Flatland, but
describing two dimensions to a one-dimensional being is near impossible. When he awakes from the dream he has a most
strange visitor, a sphere who is a resident of three dimensional Spaceland, who
does the same thing to him that he did to the Monarch of Lineland in his dream. The visitor tries to explain how Spaceland
has three dimensions. Since Flatland has
length and width, our narrator can understand these, but he has a very hard
time imagining height, as he has no frame of reference to understand such a, to
him, fantastical idea. After giving up
hope, the Sphere ends up taking the Square on a visit to Spaceland and in doing
so opens his eyes to the understanding that what he assumed was the truth of
existence is only “true” in so far as it fits his frame of reference. The genius of this is that the same idea also
applies to the Flatland residents ideas about the class structure they impose
on themselves. One cannot get past an
issue such as racism, or class-ism, or sexism, if one does not step away from
the narrow viewpoint we all live in from day to day. It is an amazing lesson and worth so much in
terms of the good it can do for society.
The
other day I saw a short video of William Shatner and Wil Wheaton talking about
things and Wil Wheaton brought up Flatland as one of his favorite books,
because of the ideas it manages to convey in such a short format. It is also one of my favorite books, and I
would love it if it was something assigned to, let’s say, all 9th
grade students in public school. It
would help prepare them for the more complex math and science ideas they need
to learn if they want to be well-educated citizens, and it would impart a lot
of wisdom regarding the need to pull oneself out of one’s old viewpoints, to
better see the world in its true nature.
I remember reading this novella maybe 20 years ago and digging on the
math and science of it but not truly understanding the societal aspects of what
Mr. Abbott discusses. It truly resonates
now. What a cool book.
(This book can be read here: http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~banchoff/Flatland/ )
(This book can be read here: http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~banchoff/Flatland/ )
Was one of my dad's favorite books, haven't heard of it in years. I think there were a series of articles in Scientific American that went into some of the nuances
ReplyDeleteAn American is putting FLATLAND on her reading list. Dimensions are a given to many, geometry actually stuck with me, Algebra-not. I appreciate your summary of FLATLAND. In the children's section- FLAT STANLEY - us a kindergarten level intro to the linear realm. Kids will draw lines, children use of crayons when coloring inside lines, often go out if the lines " box" to draw.
ReplyDeleteLABELING of their own creations gives us insight into their dimensional understanding.
Your choice to read FLATLAND may have been "out of the box" because you draw with words, which is possibly a multidimensional task. Great to meet you again.
Thank you for reading! It is greatly appreciated.
Delete