The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific
Search for the Soul – Francis Crick (1994)
The
title of his book is a bit misleading.
Francis Crick, one of the group of scientists responsible for our
current knowledge about DNA, its structure, and how it works in living plants
and animals, is not discussing what theology and religion call a “soul.” What he seeks is the means and methods by
which humans can empirically study consciousness/awareness itself.
Consciousness
is a very tricky subject for everyone involved.
Research scientists rarely explore consciousness itself, instead seeking
to understand the physical workings of the brain. Philosophers explore consciousness and
awareness but do not use the knowledge derived from the decades of work done on
physical brain structure, and the function of the many neurons in our brain. This creates a vast gap of knowledge. We know mostly how individual neurons work,
and roughly how many areas of the brain correspond to different functions and
cognitive abilities. What we do not know
includes what parts of the brain control or experience consciousness, exactly
how we create and store memories, both short term and long term, and how we
manage to process the myriad sensory inputs we constantly receive. This book is Francis Crick’s attempt to
survey the current state of things (as of 1994) while shining a light on many
areas of research that could lead to fruitful answers, focusing mainly on
visual Neuroscience.
The
“Amazing Hypothesis” in question is the proposition that what we call
consciousness, and some call a “soul,” is a product of the way the brain’s
neurons function, specifically the complex human brain, and that through
empirical experimental methods we should be able to discover and understand the
actual structure that brings about consciousness. As the brain and all of human experience
constitutes an exceedingly complex and varied system, it is best to try to
study one specific aspect, hoping it sheds some light on the bigger picture. Mr. Crick decides, based on the then-current
state of scholarship, to focus on the specific ways we see, and how our brains
process what we see.
While
many of the sciences have spent the past 100 years discovering deep truths
about the world around us, this has not happened in the study of the human
brain. There are several reasons for
this. Firstly, it is considered unethical
to conduct brain experiments on humans unless they have already suffered some
sort of trauma/damage to their brain and willfully allow a scientist to
experiment. Secondly, the study of
consciousness has been relegated to philosophers and theologians, most of whom
know very little about the actual structure and function of the brain and its
constituent parts. This means that their
explorations are more guesswork than deduction.
Thirdly, while we can study the brains of cats, rats, monkeys, or other
lab animals, this does not necessarily translate to the human brain. While a human being can be certain that they
themselves are conscious, and be fairly certain that other humans around us are
conscious, it is a much bigger jump to assume that other primates and animals
share the same consciousness that we do.
A monkey is taught/trained to do certain tasks while their brain is
monitored, but they cannot provide actual feedback like a human could. Many scientists end up focusing solely on structure
and the electrochemical reactions in the brain and not on what they mean for
the study of consciousness.
Francis
Crick decides that in order to pick a specific area to research that is likely
to provide the best answers to the consciousness question it is best to focus
on sight. How do we see? How do our eyes, nerves, and brain work together
to understand what is being seen? This
seems like a promising point of departure in the search for our
consciousness. Crick spends the first
part of this book detailing the then-current state of scientific knowledge,
exploring everything from studies on the eye’s retina, to the structure of
neurons, to the many ways they communicate both within and without
themselves. One item that surprised me
was the knowledge that many of the neurons that help the retina function act as
a processing center, before the information reaches the brain itself. In fact, the nerves that feed what your eyes see
to the brain are part of the brain itself, not just a connection. It is as if
neurons from the developing embryo brain reach out to connect to the developing
eyes. Quite cool stuff. What is also
evident in the background info Mr. Crick provides is the vast amount we do not
know. We have very rough guesses as to
what regions of the brain handle specific tasks. We still do not know how exactly the brain
regulates the massive sensory input it receives every moment of every day. We have no idea how or where memories are
stored. This vast ignorance is actually
a great thing for neuroscientists, as it helps guide them to new experiments and
areas of research.
The
latter part of the book details many possible areas and studies that could be
done to try and find the answers Mr. Crick looks for. Over a century ago it was common for educated people to
believe that a Life Force flowed through living beings, separating them from
the inanimate objects around them. No
other way could be imagined for the growth of the young, the way offspring look
like their parents, etc. Once we
understood the cardiovascular system, the pulmonary system, and finally the
structure, function, and purpose of DNA, the idea of a Life Force dissipated
and was dropped by humanity as a whole.
Francis Crick thinks that is where we are at today in regards to the
human “soul.” Many blindly accept that
it exists, especially in the forms that theologians and philosophers feel it
does, but this could change were we to understand the workings of our brain. We may find that consciousness is a direct
result of life itself. We may find that
what we call consciousness is a trait shared by any and every creature with a
neuronal brain, or we may find that only the human brain possesses the required
structure to function as an individual consciousness. The field is wide open and I cannot wait to
read more. It is nearly 30 years later
and we still do not have answers to most of Francis Crick’s questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any Thoughts?